spacer.png, 0 kB

"After my car crash, my injuries were such that I was not able to return to my job. Eventually, I was let go with no source of income. I was referred by a friend to Howard Sussman and his firm. After my initial consultation with Sussman and Associates, I not only understood what my rights were, but was able, through their assistance and initiative, to receive my wage loss benefits and other disability pay. My wholehearted thanks to their help in my time of need."

Jeffrey Cleys, Minneapolis, MN

 

Call 612.332.4830

The Minneapolis St. Paul personal injury law firm of Sussman & Associates represents people with car accident injuries and other personal injury claims.

Don't delay! Contact a personal injury lawyer before you lose your right to file a lawsuit.


spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
Home arrow Practice Areas arrow Dog Bite Injuries arrow Minnesota Dog Bite Law

Minnesota Dog Bite Law

If you are dealing with a dog bite that occurred in or around Minneapolis, you need a lawyer who is familiar with the intricacies of a Minneapolis dog bite lawsuit.

At Howard Sussman & Associates, P.A. we focus on personal injury lawsuits. We know Minnesota Dog Bite Law. Call us today at 612.332.4830 or contact us through our website, and we will be happy to discuss your dog bite case. (Initial consultations are always free.)

In the list below, we have provided a number of the Minnesota laws that could come into play in a dog bite lawsuit:

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 347.22 Damages, owner liable.

If a dog, without provocation, attacks or injures any person who is acting peaceably in any place where the person may lawfully be, the owner of the dog is liable in damages to the person so attacked or injured to the full amount of the injury sustained. The term "owner" includes any person harboring or keeping a dog but the owner shall be primarily liable. The term "dog" includes both male and female of the canine species.

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 347.50 Definitions.

Subdivision 1. Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. 

Subd. 2. Dangerous dog. "Dangerous dog" means any dog that has: 

(1) without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property;

(2) killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property; or

(3) been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals.

Subd. 3. Potentially dangerous dog. "Potentially dangerous dog" means any dog that:

(1) when unprovoked, inflicts bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property;

(2) when unprovoked, chases or approaches a person, including a person on a bicycle, upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property, other than the dog owner's property, in an apparent attitude of attack; or

(3) has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals.

Subd. 4. Proper enclosure. "Proper enclosure" means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing protection from the elements for the dog.  A roper enclosure does not include a porch, patio, or any part of a house, garage, or other structure that would allow the dog to exit of its own volition, or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which door or window screens are the only obstacles that prevent the dog from exiting. 

Subd. 5. Owner. "Owner" means any person, firm, corporation, organization, or department possessing, harboring, keeping, having an interest in, or having care, custody, or control of a dog. 

Subd. 6. Substantial bodily harm. "Substantial bodily harm" has the meaning given it under section 609.02, subdivision 7a.

Subd. 6a. Great bodily harm. "Great bodily harm" has the meaning given it under section 609.02, subdivision 8.

Subd. 7. Animal control authority. "Animal control authority" means an agency of the state, county, municipality, or other governmental subdivision of the state which is responsible for animal control operations in its jurisdiction.

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 347.51 Dangerous dogs; registration.

Subdivision 1. Requirement. No person may own a dangerous dog in this state unless the dog is registered as provided in this section. 

Subd. 2. Registration. An animal control authority shall issue a certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog if the owner presents sufficient evidence that: 

(1) a proper enclosure exists for the dangerous dog and a posting on the premises with a clearly visible warning sign, including a warning symbol to inform children, that there is a dangerous dog on the property;

(2) a surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this state in a form acceptable to the animal control authority in the sum of at least $50,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least $50,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog;

(3) the owner has paid an annual fee of not more than $500, in addition to any regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog under this section; and

(4) the owner has had microchip identification implanted in the dangerous dog as required under section 347.515.

Subd. 2a. Warning symbol. If a county issues a certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog pursuant to subdivision 2, the county must provide, for posting on the owner's property, a copy of a warning symbol to inform children that there is a dangerous dog on the property.  The design of the warning symbol must be uniform and specified by the commissioner of public safety, after consultation with animal control professionals.  The commissioner shall provide the number of copies of the warning symbol requested by each county and shall charge the county the actual cost of the warning symbols received.  The county may charge the registrant a reasonable fee to cover its administrative costs and the cost of the warning symbol. 

Subd. 3. Fee. The county may charge the owner an annual fee, in addition to any regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog under this section. 

Subd. 3a. Dangerous dog designation review. Beginning six months after a dog is declared a dangerous dog, an owner may request annually that the animal control authority review the designation.  The owner must provide evidence that the dog's behavior has changed due to the dog's age, neutering, environment, completion of obedience training that includes modification of aggressive behavior, or other factors.  If the animal control authority finds sufficient evidence that the dog's behavior has changed, the authority may rescind the dangerous dog designation.

Subd. 4. Law enforcement; exemption. The provisions of this section do not apply to dangerous dogs used by law enforcement officials for police work.

Subd. 5. Exemption. Dogs may not be declared dangerous if the threat, injury, or damage was sustained by a person:

(1) who was committing, at the time, a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner of the dog;

(2) who was provoking, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog or who can be shown to have repeatedly, in the past, provoked, tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog; or

(3) who was committing or attempting to commit a crime.

Subd. 6. Repealed, 1Sp2001 c 8 art 8 s 30

Subd. 7. Tag. A dangerous dog registered under this section must have a standardized, easily identifiable tag identifying the dog as dangerous and containing the uniform dangerous dog symbol, affixed to the dog's collar at all times.  The commissioner of public safety, after consultation with animal control professionals, shall provide by rule for the design of the tag.

Subd. 8. Local ordinances. A statutory or home rule charter city, or a county, may not adopt an ordinance regulating dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs based solely on the specific breed of the dog.  Ordinances inconsistent with this subdivision are void. 

Subd. 9. Contracted services. A county may contract with another political subdivision or other person to provide the services required under sections 347.50 to 347.54.  Notwithstanding any contract entered into under this subdivision, all fees collected under sections 347.50 to 347.54 shall be paid to the county and all certificates of registration must be issued in the name of the county.

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 347.52 Dangerous dogs; requirements.

(a) An owner of a dangerous dog shall keep the dog, while on the owner's property, in a proper enclosure.  If the dog is outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible person.  The muzzle must be made in a manner that will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal but that will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration.

(b) An owner of a dangerous dog must renew the registration of the dog annually until the dog is deceased.  If the dog is removed from the jurisdiction, it must be registered as a dangerous dog in its new jurisdiction.

(c) An owner of a dangerous dog must notify the animal control authority in writing of the death of the dog or its transfer to a new jurisdiction within 30 days of the death or transfer, and must, if requested by the animal control authority, execute an affidavit under oath setting forth either the circumstances of the dog's death and disposition or the complete name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom the dog has been transferred.

(d) An animal control authority may require a dangerous dog to be sterilized at the owner's expense.  If the owner does not have the animal sterilized, the animal control authority may have the animal sterilized at the owner's expense.

(e) A person who owns a dangerous dog and who rents property from another where the dog will reside must disclose to the property owner prior to entering the lease agreement and at the time of any lease renewal that the person owns a dangerous dog that will reside at the property.

(f) A person who sells a dangerous dog must notify the purchaser that the animal control authority has identified the dog as dangerous.  The seller must also notify the animal control authority in writing of the sale and provide the animal control authority with the new owner's name, address, and telephone number.

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 347.01 Owner's liability, penalty.

(a) Owners or keepers of any dog or dogs, that kill, wound, or worry any domestic animal or animals, shall be jointly and severally liable to the owner of such animal or animals for all damages done by such dog or dogs, without proving notice to or knowledge by any such owner or keeper of such dog or dogs, that any or either of them was mischievous or disposed to kill or worry any domestic animal. 

(b) The owner of any dog that kills or pursues domestic livestock is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.

Minnesota Statutes 2005 section 609.226. Harm caused by a dog.

Subdivision 1. Great or substantial bodily harm. A person who causes great or substantial bodily harm to another by negligently or intentionally permitting any dog to run uncontrolled off the owner's premises, or negligently failing to keep it properly confined is guilty of a misdemeanor.  A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of this section involving the same dog is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

Subd. 2. Dangerous dogs. If the owner of a dangerous dog, as defined under section 347.50, subdivision 2, has been convicted of a misdemeanor under section 347.55, and the same dog causes bodily injury to a person other than the owner, the owner is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.

Subd. 3. Defense. If proven by a preponderance of the evidence, it shall be an affirmative defense to liability under subdivision 1 or 2 that the victim provoked the dog to cause the victim's bodily harm.

Subd. 4. Harm to service animal caused by dog; crime, mandatory restitution.

(a) As used in this subdivision, "service animal" means an animal individually trained or being trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability. 

(b) A person who negligently or intentionally (1) permits the person's dog to run uncontrolled off the person's premises, or (2) fails to keep the person's dog properly confined or controlled; and as a result the dog causes bodily harm to a service animal or otherwise renders a service animal unable to perform its duties, is guilty of a misdemeanor. 

(c) The court shall order a person convicted of violating this subdivision to pay restitution for the costs and expenses resulting from the crime.  Costs and expenses include, but are not limited to, the service animal user's loss of income, veterinary expenses, transportation costs, and other expenses of temporary replacement assistance services, and service animal replacement or retraining costs incurred by a school, agency, or individual.  If the court finds that the convicted person is indigent, the court may reduce the amount of restitution to a reasonable level or order it paid in installments. 

(d) This subdivision does not preclude a person from seeking any available civil remedies for an act that violates this subdivision.

 
< Prev   Next >
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB